Many of us like to use their walking time to relax and take a walk, while others march to their destination as fast as their feet can. A new study recently found that those who walk faster have a lower risk of premature death.
They studied just over 5, 00 walkers over 30 who lived in Britain between 1994 and 2008. Data were collected on these practitioners, including how quickly they think they walk, and then analyzed health outcomes (not related to health problems and other habits such as smoking and Exercises).
It was found that any speed above the slow in walking decreased the risk of dying from cardiovascular disease, such as heart disease or stroke. Compared with those who walked more slowly, those who had an average rhythm had a 20% lower risk of premature death from any cause and a 24% lower risk of death from heart disease or stroke cerebral.
Those who reported walking at a rapid pace had a 24% lower risk of premature death from any cause and a 21% lower risk of death from cardiovascular causes.
It was also found that the beneficial effects of rapid walking were more pronounced in the older age brackets. For example, middle-aged practitioners 60 years of age or older suffered a 46% reduction in the risk of death from cardiovascular causes, and those who walked fast had a 53% reduction. Compared with slow walkers, fast walkers aged 45-59 had a 36% lower risk of premature death from any cause.
In these older age groups (but not in the whole sample or in the younger age groups), It was found that there was a linearly greater reduction in the risk of early death, the higher the rate of walking.
What does all this mean
The results suggest that walking at medium or fast speeds may be beneficial to long-term and for longevity, compared to slow walking, particularly for people the elderly.
- 2 Fish Meals Per Week Reduce Risk of Premature Death by 33%
- Practicing Tennis Can Be The Ideal Exercise To Live Longer
- Science Confirms That The More Coffee You Drink, The More You Live
- Coffee Can Increase Longevity, Show New Studies
But we also need to be aware that the study is observational, and not have full control of all probable influences to establish that it was only the walk that caused all the beneficial effects to the Cheers. For example, it may be that less healthy people have reported a slow walking pace as a result of their poor health, and also ended up dying earlier for the same reason.
To minimize the chances of this reverse causality, the researchers excluded all those who had already had heart disease, suffered a stroke or had cancer when the study began, as well as those who died in the first two years of side dish.
Another important point is that study participants self-reported their usual walking pace, which means that the responses were on their perceived rhythm. There are no set standards for what it means "slow "medium" or "fast" in terms of speed. What is perceived as a "fast" walking pace by a very sedentary and physically inadequate 70 year old will be very different from a 45 year old sportsman.
For this reason, the results can be interpreted as reflecting the relative intensity of walking (in relation to physical capacity). That is, the greater the physical effort during walking, the better the health outcomes.
For the relatively healthy middle-aged general population, walking speeds between 6 and km / h will be rapid and, if sustained, will leave most people slightly out of breath. A walking pace of 100 steps per minute is considered roughly equivalent to moderate intensity physical activity.
We all know that walking is an excellent activity for health, accessible by most people of all ages. The findings suggest that it is a good idea to move to a pace that can challenge our physiology and even make the walk more active.
Long-term health benefits aside, a faster pace will take us to our fastest destination and free up time for all the other things that can make our daily routines special, like spending time with loved ones or reading a good book.
Do you often go hiking? Do you believe in what speed and pace? May it be getting the best health benefits or can it improve? Comment below!(2votes, average:, 0of 5)